Munro & Co
Scots law intestate estates and Confirmation for a sole practitioner
80-100 hours saved
Annual time saved on prior rights calculations
The Problem#
- Scots succession law is fundamentally different from English law — no Grant of Probate (Scotland uses Confirmation, issued by the Sheriff Court), automatic prior rights for surviving spouses, and automatic legal rights (legitim) for children regardless of the will
- Prior rights thresholds change over time (updated periodically by the Scottish Government) and must be applied as at the date of death
- Munro & Co handles 40-50 intestate estates per year but cannot afford bespoke case management software
- The firm uses generic office tools and submits paper applications to Edinburgh Sheriff Court
- Each application requires manually calculating prior rights thresholds and legal rights fractions — taking 1-2 hours per estate with paper reference tables
How They’d Use INHERIT#
- Use the
scotlandextension to structure each estate:confirmationobject withsheriffCourt: "Edinburgh",confirmationType("confirmation"or"small_estate_certificate"), andinventoryValue - Model the three prior rights via
priorRights—dwellinghouseRight,furnitureRight, andfinancialProvision— each as acommon/temporal-rule.jsonreference that automatically applies the correct threshold for the date of death - Record legal rights in the
legalRightsobject:jusRelictae(spouse’s share — 1/3 with children, 1/2 without),legitim(children’s share — 1/3 with surviving spouse, 1/2 without), anddeadsPart(the freely disposable remainder) - Set
estate.jsonwithdomicileto Scotland viacommon/jurisdiction.json, useperson.jsonfor the deceased and claimants,asset.jsonandproperty.jsonfor estate contents - Capture family relationships in
kinship.jsonto determine prior rights and legal rights entitlements
The Integration#
- Export-focused: Munro & Co generates INHERIT documents from estate records and submits them alongside Confirmation applications
- If Edinburgh Sheriff Court adopts INHERIT, the structured format would allow auto-population of court systems, reducing the current 8-12 week manual processing time
The Business Case#
- 80-100 hours saved per year on manual prior rights calculations and structured inventory preparation
- Time savings allow the firm to handle an additional 5-8 estates annually without hiring — generating approximately £15,000-£24,000 in additional fee income
- Structured Confirmation inventories reduce errors that currently cause Sheriff Court returns and delays
- A sole practitioner gains access to the same data structure used by large firms — levelling the playing field
Before / After#
Without INHERIT:
- Munro receives instructions for an intestate estate in Edinburgh
- He looks up the current prior rights thresholds in paper tables, cross-referencing against the date of death to find the correct historic values
- He manually calculates the surviving spouse’s dwellinghouse right, furniture right, and financial provision — checking each against the threshold
- He calculates legitim and jus relictae fractions based on the family structure
- He prepares a paper inventory for Edinburgh Sheriff Court, typing asset details into a template
- The paper application is posted; Confirmation is issued after 8-12 weeks
With INHERIT:
- Munro enters the estate data into an INHERIT-compatible tool — deceased, spouse, children, assets, property
- The
scotlandextension’s temporal rules automatically apply the correct prior rights thresholds for the date of death - Legal rights fractions are calculated from the
kinship.jsonfamily structure - A structured Confirmation inventory is generated from the INHERIT document
- The application is submitted digitally; if the court accepts INHERIT, processing time is significantly reduced
“I was spending two hours per estate looking up prior rights thresholds in paper tables. INHERIT applies the correct figures for the date of death automatically.”Alistair Munro, Principal Solicitor, Munro & Co
Disclaimer: Munro & Co is a fictional organisation created for illustrative purposes. This case study describes a hypothetical integration scenario. All metrics, savings, and outcomes are projected estimates, not actual results. References to real regulatory bodies, courts, and legislation are for accuracy and do not imply endorsement.