Fortis Insurance Group
Life insurance death claims with estate context across 40 jurisdictions
42 → 18 days
Average death claim processing time
The Problem#
- Fortis receives approximately 200,000 life insurance death claims per year across 40 jurisdictions
- Each claim requires verification that the claimant is entitled to proceeds — depending on whether the policy was written in trust, whether the nominated beneficiary is still valid, and whether forced heirship rules override the nomination
- Claims handlers manually request estate documentation from solicitors, wait weeks for responses, and re-key data from scanned PDFs
- Fraudulent claims — where a claimant misrepresents their relationship to the deceased — account for an estimated 1.8% of claims by value
- Forced heirship rules in France, Japan, and Islamic jurisdictions can override policy nominations, but this is currently checked manually
How They’d Use INHERIT#
- Model each life insurance policy using
insurance-policy.jsonwithpolicyType: "life", linked to Fortis viaorganisation.jsonwithorganisationType: "insurance_provider" - Capture beneficiary designations in
nonprobate-transfer.jsonwithtransferType: "life_insurance_nomination"andpassesOutsideEstate: truefor policies that bypass probate - For EU jurisdictions, use the
eu-successionextension’sBrusselsIVChoiceOfLawtype to determine which country’s succession law governs - For Japan, apply the
japanextension’sIryubunClaim[]to model reserved-share claims wherereservedFractionmay override the policy nomination - Use
common/provenance.jsonto trace the origin of each claim document —source,capturedAt, andcapturedBycreate an audit trail - Record AI-assisted document processing via
common/ai-provenance.jsonwith model, confidence score, and human review status
The Integration#
- Bidirectional via API: Fortis exposes an endpoint accepting INHERIT documents alongside claim forms from solicitors and estate administrators
- Internally, INHERIT data maps to underwriting and fraud detection pipelines
- Fortis returns INHERIT-formatted policy data to estate administrators, enabling solicitors to import policy details directly into their case management systems
The Business Case#
- Average claim processing time drops from 42 days to 18 days across 200,000 claims
- Earlier payouts release approximately £180 million per year (at an average claim value of £85,000)
- Automated beneficiary verification using
kinship.jsonandnonprobate-transfer.jsonreduces fraudulent payouts by an estimated 0.4 percentage points — worth approximately £14 million annually on a £3.4 billion claims book
Before / After#
Without INHERIT:
- Family member contacts Fortis to report a death and submits a claim form
- Claims handler requests estate documentation from the solicitor — death certificate, grant of probate, proof of relationship
- Solicitor sends scanned PDFs; handler re-keys deceased details, policy number, and claimant information
- Handler manually checks whether forced heirship rules in the relevant jurisdiction override the policy nomination
- Fraud team reviews the claim against known patterns — limited by unstructured data
- Claim settles after an average of 42 days
With INHERIT:
- Solicitor submits an INHERIT document alongside the claim, containing
person.json,kinship.json, andnonprobate-transfer.json - Fortis system auto-matches the policy via
insurance-policy.jsonfields and verifies claimant entitlement against structured kinship data - Forced heirship checks run automatically using jurisdiction-specific extensions
- Claim settles after an average of 18 days
“We were paying £14 million a year in fraudulent claims because we couldn't verify family relationships at speed. Structured kinship data changed that.”Helena Voss, Chief Claims Officer, Fortis Insurance Group
Disclaimer: Fortis Insurance Group is a fictional organisation created for illustrative purposes. This case study describes a hypothetical integration scenario. All metrics, savings, and outcomes are projected estimates, not actual results. References to real regulatory bodies, courts, and legislation are for accuracy and do not imply endorsement.